Jean-Louis Cohen Comments on Narkomfin

Jean-Louis Cohen comments on the current situation surrounding the Narkomfin building

Жан-Луи Коэн комментирует текущую ситуацию вокруг дома Наркомфина

IMAG0715
See photos of the renovation works going on inside the Narkomfin building in the past several months HERE.

Posted in Under Threat, Videos | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Narkomfin’s new life

(Translation from original article in Афиша-Город + photos/comments by Natalia Melikova in response)

“Guys, relax, you will not control us”: Narkomfin’s new life

Apartments in the Narkomfin building will be bought by friends of the owner, instead of preparing borscht will need to go to Coffeemania, and better to rebuild Shukhov Tower in New Moscow: “Gorod” talked with Alexander Senatorov, head of Kopernik, about the future of monument buildings.

IMG_2248

Narkomfin is well on the way to its “new life”… – photo: April 11, 2014

In 2007, when you were involved with the Narkomfin building, then you wanted to do a boutique hotel, and now what will be there?

In the new concept we are keeping the function of Mosei Ginzburg’s original design. The residential block will remain residential, private apartments will be there. The communal block will remain as a public space: there, where the dining room was — will be a restaurant; where the kindergarten was planned — will be a children’s play center. And of course, we will return the original appearance to the building, which it lost because the first floor was built up. In addition, practical people attached garages and an upper floor to the communal block, and the joined windows they divided into normal windows — well, so that they opened. Plus the façade was badly damaged, which was made of the so-called kamyshit (cane fiber) — the last syllable of the word, “shit,” best describes this material.

One can say that kamyshit (cane fiber) was innovative for its time, but not a durable material.

Well, how to explain to you in a literary way? Eighty years ago out of shit they tried to sculpt something. We don’t have any delusions that we will be able to a large extent restore the facade out of the original material. But in terms of the exterior, the new facade will look like the same. In reference to heritage discourse – the one who does not sacrifice the small things, loses everything. The key value of the building is in its unique layout designs – this we will keep. But kamyshit will become history.

In 2007, your team of experts, including the architect Ginzburg’s grandson, prepared a restoration project. It was approved by Mosgornaslediya. Why did you decide to change the design and bring in another architect?

We rejected the idea of doing a boutique hotel because it is not very convenient to do it here. These apartments are good for living, but absurd as hotel rooms. Such large apartment would have cost about $1500-2000 a day for the hotel to be profitable. Nobody will pay that kind of money — not to mention the fact that we do not comply with any standards for people with disabilities, simply in each apartment there are stairs. Since we started this project, we went through a crisis, we went through a period of fruitful cooperation with the red banner Alfa-Bank (Senatorov was in litigation with the bank for several years. — editor’s note) — so we have had enough time to understand ourselves, the building, and what is worth doing here.

The current architect of the project is Nikolai Pereslegin, Advisor to the Head of Mosgornaslediya. That is, the contractor and controlling body are closely related. Will there be, as demanded by activists and historians of architecture, any independent monitoring expert committee?

The most important regulators of this project — it is our common sense and conscience. There should be one person who makes the decisions. That will be me.

(article from April 15, 2014:
Nikolai Pereslegin on saving the Narkomfin building / Николай Переслегин о спасении здания Наркомфина

“I became aware of the work currently being carried out at Narkomfin. I am fundamentally opposed. It is illegal. As far as I know, the work being carried out has already been stopped by an inspection by Mosgornaslediye.

It is my deep conviction that the potential restoration project should be as much as possible open, and public. It is very important to involve in the process of restoration, both professionals and the public. After all, Narkomfin is more than just a building. It is an icon of its time, a whole world for many people. Strange that this is not remembered.”
)

It is wonderful when there is good will and conscience. But even better when there is a system that can regulate itself.

In our country, there is no system. Institutionalism — this is not about our country. And what is the fright here that during the restoration of Narkomfin we need to build some kind of system that, you know, would protect this great monument from the investor, who already has invested in it many years of his life, and several million dollars of his money? A couple of months ago we met with this concerned public. People came, in varying degrees of aggression, asked questions and got answers to all of them. I showed them the concept and described everything in detail. But they have already embarked on a warpath, and some time later sent a letter with the question: “How are we going to control you?” Guys, relax, you will not control us in any way. And without your public control we have rather formal procedures with Mosgornaslediya. No one in our country has experience with the restoration of constructivism. And in the world, those who made this era are only maybe a couple of people. The basis of success is my common sense and my experience. I built a lot in Moscow. I understand how to solve problems that no one has yet solved.

05.05.2014_ДКН-16-29-357_4-3_Ожерельев_М.В

Part of the “formal procedures” with Mosgornasledie – a letter from May 5, 2014 saying:
“Design documentation for review and approval has not been received by Mosgornaslediye, the permission to undertake works and any conclusions about the acceptability of the conversion of the interior and [or] nonresidential redevelopments has not been issued.”

From The Moscow Times article on April 13, 2014,
Constructivist Utopia Narkomfin Endangered by Renovation Project

“Senatorov says that he will welcome any outside help with the project, but eventually, all must go ahead as planned. ‘I am ready to accept any help if they want to help us,’ he said. ‘If you want to help us with advice, with money, with work, everything — everyone who wants to help, help! But we are owners, and we have to do the restoration. We can’t wait to see whether somebody will help us but if somebody wants to help us we are willing to accept it,’ said Senatorov.”

Preservationists complain that already old radiators have been illegally removed and windows are being changed to glazing (стеклопакеты).

I especially like this claim: “Ah! You are sawing off radiators!” So what? Well it’s a radiator. Let’s without fanfare and without this squeaking: “There’s no beer!” It can be said calmer — simply, there’s no beer. What is the value of engineering equipment, which represents old stinking sewer pipes? We need to preserve the layout. As a result of the restoration we will be able to keep most of the materials. Old pipes have no value.

Narkomfin_original_radiators

“Old pipes with no value” – archival photo

And what about the windows?

Everyone already has come to photograph our new windows to post it on social networks, and to raise a tantrum. Well hello, guys, I did say at the meeting that this is a temporary solution. The result will be double glazing as before, but one of the layers will be glazing (стеклопакет). On the outside everything will look like as it did before, but in function we will get a quality noiseless glazing.

Narkomfin, new windows, west facade

New windows – western facade

Narkomfin original windows

Original windows intact – April 2014

For expensive housing an elevator is needed. And there were only two stairwells. You are not allowed to change the layout. What will you do about this?

We will carefully incorporate the elevators into the stairwells. This is the only change of layout that we are going forward with. Currently there is an ugly elevator adjoined to the far stairwell — we will remove it. But we cannot do without any elevator.

Narkomfin stairwell with elevator

March 17, 2014

Narkomfin stairwell with elevator

April 1, 2014

In reality, Narkomfin is a residential project. It is a Soviet utopian experiment on people, who were to live in cells with minimal household functions. From the point of view of modern man, a disturbing experiment. How can we reconcile our understanding of individual comfort with a careful restoration? How can a 30s dormitory be converted into luxury?

You know, perceptions change: what seems to be comfortable today will cease to be comfortable tomorrow. And then at some point, everything turns back — this is a cyclical process. And surprisingly, the housing that was invented in the 30s under the inhuman arrangement of society and daily life, today uncomfortable housing is becoming very practical. Ginzburg saw it the same way — they are all communists, they have a common table, laundry, in the morning they are supposed to go into these long corridors and do exercises there, and then go together to the cafeteria. But this was his idea of how life should be constructed, and in Soviet times it was uncomfortable. And people lived in these apartments without much pleasure. But today, the level of the development of services has reached such a state that to live in this format suddenly has become comfortable. Today this building more than meets the current ways of society. These city apartments present a small, but very hip in its architecture, two-level space. Ideal for one or two people. There are all services here — parking, restaurant, laundry and a recreation area on the roof. Yes, there is a small kitchen. Well, why does modern man need a big one — to boil a kettle and reheat pizza? In the communal block we will build a restaurant, presumably we will invite our friendly Coffeemania. Step out to eat or order home delivery. What else is needed? To cook borscht, to use a frying pan? Well it’s clear, the one who wants to cook borscht, will not get an apartment here.

And who are the people who will get [an apartment]?

Here there will be 42 apartments. Sales will be closed — a determined set of people on a list will be offered to buy them. Six months ago we moved here, and I have already brought various friends here. And many people come and say, “Awesome! Leave me one.” There are enough people like these, I have a large circle of friends. We do not have the idea to sell it more expensively, it is more important for us to restore the idea of communal housing in the modern sense. It will be a home for a determined set of people, pleasant to us.

What will happen to the roof?

Ginzburg originally planned to build a house with a flat roof. But after the project was already completed, the People’s Commissar of Finance Milutin said: “Where will I live?” Ginzburg threw up his hands in the air, and Milutin gestured: “Build it!” Besides, he was fond of architecture, which was at that time a quite fashionable pastime. So he himself designed the penthouse — a kind of button on the roof. With the Commissar one cannot really argue, so in front of it Ginzburg designed five more small one room apartments on the roof — to visually smooth out this bump. Out of these, we will create a mini-hotel with five rooms. We are thinking about organizing some kind of social life, about bringing in different interesting lecturers, to conduct exhibitions on the rooftop. Therefore, a hotel will come in handy, so that our guests could always stay there.

IMG_2308

IMG_2219

PHOTOS from April 11, 2014 of the roof and penthouse renovation

How much you have spent and how much more will you spend on this story? And how much will you potentially earn?

We have already spent about $18 million and plan to spend another $10-12 million plan to purchase the remaining areas and on restoration. We will sell the apartments and all public spaces will remain in our property to rent out for different services. This will be enough to make back everything.

View the apartments & prices: http://www.adwill.ru/offers/moskva/novinskiy-bulvar-25-str-1

Narkomfin, K apt renovation

one of the larger K apartments undergoing renovation – photo: April 22, 2014

Do you still need to buy up a lot?

In the building there are four apartments left with former tenants. Plus 1,300 meters belong to Moscow. Actually, out of it more than half needs to be destroyed — this is the illegally added on first floor and all sorts of additions in the utility block. If Moscow had removed all that is subject to demolition, then in fact, nothing would be left to it in the building. But it will not do this for anything. Can you imagine the official, who was entrusted with 1,300 meters in the building, and he went and destroyed half? Well he’s the enemy, and he should be shot. So we will buy up a lot and then break it — we are private owners, we can allow ourselves to do this.

What is the timeframe?

Timeframe depends on how quickly we will go through all the stages of negotiating the new concept. We hope to go through this procedure within a year and a half. And for the work itself much time is not needed — a year is enough.

How do you feel about what is going on with the monuments of constructivism in Moscow? For example, what do you think about the Shukhov Tower?

The Melnikova Research and Design Institute of Metal Construction, the former “Shukhov Workshop” — belongs to us. This is the main expert in the matter of what you can do with the tower. And anything can be done — it all depends on political will. We do not have established conceptions in our culture of what is actually valuable in architectural monuments. There is, for example, the Dutch system of preservation — they preserve all the materials and structures. But the British have a more pragmatic and utilitarian view of life. To them, it is the human idea and the design that is valuable: “A man thought up that this looked like this and stands like this? Very well then, let’s demolish all this trash and with new technologies we will build it in the same way.” We haven’t yet defined what to regard as valuable — we jump from one extreme to another.

And what do you personally think it’s worth doing with the tower?

Personally I like most of all the concept that we came up with. It may sound harsh and unpleasant. But in the current state of the tower to preserve it in the same place is impossible. The Ministry of Communications does not need it there. Now begins the endless correspondence — the Ministry of Culture will write: “Restore it!” And the Ministry of Communications will respond: “We have no money”; — “Restore it!”, “We have no money,” … And like this it will crash down. Metal rivets are already flying from it. At the same time the lowest estimates to restore it at the same place are 400 million rubles. And to build a new, exactly identical one — 80 million. Feel the difference.

Well, in addition to the high cost there are such aspects as authenticity and the memory of the place.

These things have value, but not for the Shukhov Tower, because it is a symbol of engineering. This is not architecture. I understand — the Eiffel Tower, Champ de Mars, where all stroll. And what is here? It is not even visible from most places. It can be relocated to any other place. As for authenticity, in its present state with the restoration in place, for 400 million rubles under the most optimistic estimates 25% of the materials can be kept. And what kind of historical authenticity can one say about this? We propose a radical design, a bit rowdy. After all the initial project of the Shukhov Tower was supposed to be much higher — 350 meters high, that is the highest at that time. But during the Civil War it worked out to make it only 148 meters. And that’s what we are proposing: we cut it down, all the old, authentic material melted, add to it new metal, and then from this mixture in a new location build a tower in its initial 350-meter form. In this case its function of a transmitter is returned to it. I would have it built in New Moscow so that the tower became an attraction and a symbol — a combination of old and new. In the end, something is lost, but something is found. Well, this old tower is lost at its former place — on the plus side a new, even better one appears — a tall, beautiful tower, which had never been built before.

Shukhov Tower

“a new tower is better than this (^above pictured) old one”

There is a feeling that monuments of constructivism here are particularly unlucky. They are adored by foreign art historians and architects, but here they are in a wildly derelict state and not appreciated. Home come?

Because in the 1930s they experimented and built out of shit. And current statesmen do not understand the charms of these strange angular shapes. And the fact that out of this emerged all of modern and functional design, such as Ikea — that they do not care about: “And where are the soft sofas, where’s the gold plating?” This judgment call is associated with the level of education and culture. I have a funny story about a real monument of architecture, which is seen out of our window — Novinsky Passage. At the opening ceremony Mayor Luzhkov in his flashy style commented on the neighborhood: “What a joy that in our city such wonderful, new shopping centers are appearing — not such junk” — pointing in the direction of Narkomfin. Because — well, that building is old, not a palace, who needs it? Neither lions nor reliefs for you. Minimalism — this is generally a philosophy that is quite difficult to understand.

Already eight years that you have been involved with this building. Have you regretted that you got involved in this story?

Of course I regretted, and not once. At some point you think: “Dang, I have put in there so much money, and it would have come in so handy now.” But the money is gone, and so there’s nothing to regret — moving on. I just love this house. It has a fantastic force of energy.

………………………………………………………………
Check out the response to this interview:

“To treat Narkomfin as his own dacha is presumptuous”: response to Senatorov

The interview with Alexander Senatorov about the future of Narkomfin caused a strong reaction in the professional community. Former representative of the Narkomfin Foundation and chief editor of Moscow Heritage, Yana Mirontseva told Gorod what the “concerned public” wants from Senatorov.

(Full translation of the response in progress)
………………………………………………………………
RECENT ARTICLES ABOUT NARKOMFIN:

1.07.2014
«Зарядочка — а потом в столовую»
Глава группы «Коперник» Александр Сенаторов — о том, кто и как будет жить в Доме Наркомфина после реставрации

20.06.2014
Восстановление дома Наркомфина начнется в обозримом будущем

29.05.2014
Дом Наркомфина — варварское освоение вместо реставрации

12.05.2014
Дому Наркомфина требуется полноценная реставрация, а не косметический ремонт

23.04.2014
Police Halt ‘Illegal’ Renovations in Narkomfin

18.04.2014
Ремонтные работы в доме Наркомфина продолжаются несмотря на заявление о том, что они остановлены

17.04.2014
Власти Москвы пресекли незаконные строительные работы в Доме Наркомфина

15.04.2014
Николай Переслегин о спасении здания Наркомфина

14.04.2014
В доме Наркомфина продолжается незаконный и разрушительный ремонт

13.04.2014
Constructivist Utopia Narkomfin Endangered by Renovation Project

31.03.2014
Александр Сенаторов вернулся в конструктивизм
“Коперник” обновил проект восстановления дома Наркомфина

->Collection of news articles about Narkomfin starting from 2000

Posted in Photos, Under Threat, Words | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Melnikov House & Construction Site

Melnikov House - bedroom2014
^Bedroom inside the Melnikov House, photographed May 15, 2014.

Arbat 39-41 construction site<br />
June 5, 2014
^Construction site of a multi-functional complex at Arbat 39-41, photographed June 5, 2014.

What’s the big deal about the neighboring construction site some 30 meters away from the Melnikov House? Read about it here:

In May 2013, the Shchusev State Museum of Architecture wrote to Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin:

Currently on the site at the address: Moscow, Arbat St., 39, bldgs 1 and 2, and 41, bldgs 1 and 2, the preparatory works are in progress to start excavation work on the pit for underground parking. The construction of this multi-functional complex are the following organizations:
Customer JSC “Trust OIL” (tel: 8-495-730-35-25);
Project Organization, LLC “Senab Project” (tel. 8-495-650-20-29);
Technical Customer “SKT PRAM” (tel: 8-499-255-33-65);
General Contractor Company “StroyMontazhTsentr-2000″ (tel. 8-495-995-51-54).

Given the existence of shifting karst-suffusion of soil in the plot where the Melnikov House is located, it is necessary to take urgent action to preserve the cultural heritage of the “House and Studio of architect K. S. Melnikov,” whose condition in recent months has deteriorated sharply.

In order to save a unique monument of history and culture ‘House and Studio of architect K. S. Melnikov’ we ask you, dear Sergei Semenovich, to immediately stop all construction work in the area of the protected zone of the Melnikov House and to create an independent group of experts to determine the current state of the monument and assess the negative impact of the work in the area of the protected zone on the house.

Read the letter in its entirety here.

As the photo from June 5 shows, a year after the appeal to the Moscow Mayor,
CONSTRUCTION HAS NOT STOPPED.

For comparison, here’s what the construction site looked like in July 2013:

WHY are the karsts that were found to be dangerous to the Melnikov House in the 2006 geophysical survey conducted by Education and Science Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow State Construction University, which can be read in its entirety here, no longer a threat?

24. Due to the design solution for the building surveyed never providing for its functioning at possible emergency loads in the high geological risk area, any construction in the vicinity of the building surveyed, including the construction in the plot adjoining the site from the Arbat Street side of the multipurpose shopping mall planned by Trust-oil Company can provoke intensification of the soil settlement and the surface caving which will be an unfavorable and inadmissible factor for Architect Melnikov’s house preservation. In addition, it should be noted that the construction of the multipurpose shopping mall with extensive underground structures is planned for the karst-prone area where the Carboniferous age primary deposits subside sharply. Development of subterranean spaces in such areas is inadmissible due to hazard of subterranean slides occurring in the overlying mass of water-saturated sand Quaternary deposits.
(last item listed in the findings of the 2006 geophysical survey)

More about the fight for the Melnikov House here.

Posted in Photos, Under Threat, Videos, Words | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

PHOTOS: Shukhov Tower Rally

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_01
PHOTOS from The Constructivist Project on Instagram

29.05.2014 “On Presnya a rally was held in defense of the 100-year-old Shukhov radio tower
Young Muscovites demand to save a masterpiece of the Russian avant-garde for the capital”

http://www.mk.ru/moscow/2014/05/29/na-presne-proshel-miting-v-zashhitu-100letnejj-shuhovskojj-radiobashni.html

29.05.2014 “Rally in defense of the Shukhov Tower”
http://yopolis.ru/post/37551

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_02

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_03

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_04

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_05

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_06

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_07

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_08

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_09

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_10

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_11

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_12

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_13

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_14

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_15

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_16

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_17

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_18

Shukhov_Tower_Rally_19

Posted in Events, Photos, Under Threat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Shukhov Tower – May 29 RALLY

may29_shukhovtower_rally
(photo from the rally’s Facebook event)

Архнадзор – Шуховская башня: открытое письмо Д.Медведеву
(Archnadzor – Shukhov Tower: open letter to D. Medvedev)

28.05.2014 “Архнадзор” попросил Медведева запретить демонтаж и перенос Шуховской башни
http://www.interfax.ru/moscow/378363

28.05.2014 В Москве пройдет митинг в защиту Шуховской башни
http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=1627587&cid=7

28.05.2014 «Архнадзор» просит Медведева защитить Шуховскую башню от сноса
http://www.vedomosti.ru/realty/news/27066981/arhnadzor-prosit-medvedeva-zaschitit-shuhovskuyu-bashnyu-ot

27.05.2014 Митинг в защиту Шуховской башни
http://moscowarch.ru/news/miting-v-zashhitu-shuhovskoy-bashni

23.05.2014 Шаболовская башня в шаге от уничтожения, митинг в ее защиту – 29 мая
http://archi.ru/russia/55154/shabolovskaya-bashnya-v-shage-ot-unichtozheniya

Posted in Events, news, Under Threat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Дом Наркомфина – ответ от ДКН

05.05.2014_ДКН-16-29-357_4-3_Ожерельев_М.В

Posted in news, Photos, Under Threat, Words | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

April 22 Narkomfin Inspection

narkomfin_police_april22_2014

22 апреля снова зафиксированы несанкционированные строительные работы в доме Наркомфина. На видео и фото – рабочие в окнах квартир и пентхаусе: кто красит внешнюю стену, кто работает «болгаркой» в жилом помещении. По сигналу активистов приехал наряд оперативного реагирования, и с ними удалось попасть внутрь здания, в одну из «нехороших» квартир. Там открылось то, что происходит во многих жилых домах-памятниках Москвы. Под видом благоустройства дома и прилегающей территории (надо сказать, что задний двор дома сильно запущен) во многих квартирах искореняется стиль, задуманный архитекторами-авангардистами. Например, рабочие занимаются побелкой стен и заменой оконных рам (кстати, старые, скорее всего просто выбрасываются), а ведь заполнение оконных проемов включено в предмет охраны памятника. И вообще все происходит стихийно, без проекта и обсуждения. Не смущает заказчиков ни отсутствие разрешительной документации на проведение работ, ни отсутствие свидетельств регистрации собственников, трудовых соглашений наемных рабочих. Юристы ООО «Центурион», так во всяком случае они представились, на пальцах в течение получаса объясняли полиции, что здесь частная собственность, и даже перекрыли вход в «нехорошую квартиру», прибегнув к услугам охранника. В результате отвечал за все стрелочник – рабочий. Ему-то и пришлось писать объяснение во дворе, на бампере машины ОВД, а «Центурион» стоял вокруг и продолжал защищать частную собственность. Активисты отправились на машине ОВД в полицию для дачи письменных показаний. Происходящее вызывает тревогу, так как такими темпами за месяц-другой просто «зачистят» весь дом, и ничто, кроме стен и перекрытий, не будет напоминать о знаменитой утопии – доме-коммуне 1920х гг.

narkomfin_windows
22.04.2014

painting_narkomfin
22.04.2014

police_inspect_narkomfin
22.04.2014

narkomfin_ police_paperwork
22.04.2014

1.07.2014
Глава группы «Коперник» Александр Сенаторов — о том, кто и как будет жить в Доме Наркомфина после реставрации

1.07.2014
«Ребят, расслабьтесь, вы не будете нас контролировать»: новая жизнь Наркомфина

20.06.2014
Восстановление дома Наркомфина начнется в обозримом будущем

20.06.2014
Дому Наркомфина пообещали реконструкцию

29.05.2014
Незаконный ремонт в Доме Наркомфина продолжается

29.05.2014
Дом Наркомфина — варварское освоение вместо реставрации

12.05.2014
Дому Наркомфина требуется полноценная реставрация, а не косметический ремонт

23.04.2014
Police Halt ‘Illegal’ Renovations in Narkomfin

18.04.2014
Ремонтные работы в доме Наркомфина продолжаются несмотря на заявление о том, что они остановлены

17.04.2014
Власти Москвы пресекли незаконные строительные работы в Доме Наркомфина

15.04.2014
Николай Переслегин о спасении здания Наркомфина

14.04.2014
В доме Наркомфина продолжается незаконный и разрушительный ремонт

13.04.2014
Constructivist Utopia Narkomfin Endangered by Renovation Project

31.03.2014
Александр Сенаторов вернулся в конструктивизм
“Коперник” обновил проект восстановления дома Наркомфина

Posted in news, Photos, Under Threat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Narkomfin Renovation Photos – Penthouse

Renovation works in Narkomfin’s penthouse: photographed on April 11, 2014.
Read “Constructivist Utopia Narkomfin Endangered by Renovation Project” in The Moscow Times HERE.

IMG_2218

IMG_2219

IMG_2226

IMG_2232

IMG_2235

IMG_2240

IMG_2241

IMG_2246

IMG_2257

IMG_2251

IMG_2248

IMG_2247

IMG_2259

IMG_2263

IMG_2265

IMG_2272

IMG_2275

IMG_2286

IMG_2284

IMG_2288

IMG_2308

IMG_2316

IMG_2319

IMG_2322

Posted in Photos, Under Threat | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Shukhov Tower Analysis

Shukhov Tower

 

After observing the situation for some time now and processing all the recent articles about the Shukhov Tower, I’ve put together some thoughts on what’s been going on concerning the tower.

QUESTIONS

The recent actions of the Ministry of Communications has put the spotlight on the Shukhov Tower. Now that everything is out in the open, it’s worthwhile to highlight some unanswered questions:

The critical condition that the tower finds itself in today is nothing new. While admittedly deteriorating with each passing year, the tower has in fact been in such a “critical” condition for a long time, not having been painted with anti-corrosion substance for over 30 years. The tower became a property of the Ministry of Communications in 2002. In 2009, 135 million rubles were allocated for the restoration of the tower with Putin’s support. It is unclear where this money went and is a question in itself. So,

WHY has the tower not once, at bare minimum, been painted with anti-corrosion substance? (The Eiffel tower is painted once every 7 years)

WHY did the Ministry of Communications not spend their own money on preventative actions since one way or another the maintenance of historical buildings is required by the property’s owners.

WHY have they not been penalized for negligence? (They’ve demonstrated 12 years of inaction. And now they want to get rid of the tower…)

WHY February 2014? What has made the tower suddenly such a liability that it has to be immediately dismantled?

WHY after the unanimous agreement (the tower should be restored in place without dismantling) that was reached at the Public Chambers session on March 7, later the same day the exact opposite of this is included in the draft proposal ?

PROPAGANDA

The media did their part in spreading the claim that the tower posed an imminent danger, going as far as providing computer graphics to show how the tower would fall and smash into neighboring buildings within a radius of 150 meters. Between sensationalized articles and news reports on TV, there’s been a lot of misinformation spread.

Aleksei Volin, the Ministry of Communications Deputy Minister behind the view that the Shukhov Tower poses a threat to safety, had some interesting comments regarding the role of media at the “Journalism in 2012: The Profession and Its Function in Society” conference held last February:

Do mass media serve a propaganda function? Of course they do, to the extent their owners believe appropriate. … Propaganda should not be obvious; propaganda should be hidden — then and only then can it be effective.

Hiding behind fear of the tower falling, the media has been effective in confusing a portion of the public. While activists were collecting signatures to save the Shukhov Tower from demolition, numerous people questioned their efforts, expressing concern that the tower is in a dangerous condition as they had heard in the news, and so of course it should be taken down to prevent an accident.

If this was indeed a serious life threatening risk, one might ask than why did the Ministry of Communications not doing anything about it earlier?

SETTING THINGS STRAIGHT

In response to sensationalized misinformation, numerous articles were dedicated to setting the facts straight, a summary of the main points:

1. Regarding the danger of the tower, there is no immediate danger to public safety.
- Because of its foundation, the tower can not fall down to one side as has been shown in graphics
- Extensive corrosion has indeed cause pieces to fall off. But they fall straight down, within the territory of the tower that is closed off to the public.
- Due to the tower’s design, the structure remains stable even when there are weak points caused by corrosion

2. Regarding the proposal to dismantle the tower, taking apart the tower would equal to its destruction.
- There are over 10,000 pieces. If it is taken apart, it is doubtful it will be put back together.
- The tower was built without blueprints. Shukhov personally oversaw the construction making the tower a “hand made” work. Anything reassembled would be a replica.
- A reassembled tower would lose its authenticity and integrity, preventing it from becoming a UNESCO site.
- It is more expensive to dismantle the tower than to restore it in place.

3. Regarding the idea to move the tower to a more “visible” location, the tower should stay in its historical location.
- The location of the tower is just as much a part of its history, as well as part of the tower’s regional cultural heritage site status
- While the construction of highrise buildings in historical areas are prohibited, there is an exception that a new building of the same height as the previous building is allowed. So on the freed up territory of the Shukhov Tower, a 160 meter luxury residential tower would be permissible, and very profitable.
- In 1991 Russia signed the International Convention on the Protection of the Architectural Heritage of Europe in 1985. In which Article 5 states: “Each Party undertakes to prohibit the removal, in whole or in part, of any protected monument, except where the material safeguarding of such monuments makes removal imperative.” There is no safeguarding required, except from negligence and greed.

1985convention-infographic

RESTORATION

Not to get into all the nuts and bolts (pun intended) of the restoration, but simply stated: it should be performed without disassembling the tower and the tower should remain in its historic place.

At the press conference and panel discussion on March 19, Galina Shelyapina of the Melnikova Research and Design Institute of Metal Construction, presented the institute’s recommendations for the tower’s restoration, a simple and economical approach:

- Reconstruction and evaluation of the tower can be done simultaneously, with repairs done in phases, fixing the most critical parts first.
- No complicated scaffolding required, the structure can support the weight of several teams working directly on the tower at once.
- This type of restoration is the most economical, with an estimation that work can be completed in 1.5 to 2 years
- Recommended to promote the tower as a tourist site and create a cultural complex in honor of Shukhov and engineering.

YOU can still sign the Change.org petition against the dismantling of the tower!

Posted in Words | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Google Doodle: Shukhov Tower

Just for fun, Shukhov Radio Tower Google Doodle!
Google doodle, Shukhov Tower

Posted in Photos | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment